GratisAI learning · weigh stale citations by how often your draft relies on them · local-first FREE TIER 1 Free Run Available
source recency docket · clerk's docket sheet

Weigh Stale Citations by How Often Your Draft Relies on Them

An old source used once in a literature review is a footnote; the same source carrying four argumentative claims is a risk. Weigh each citation’s years past your recency rule by how often the draft leans on it.

1 · cited source | years since publication | times cited in draft

FIRST-LOAD

Input is processed locally and a draft is saved automatically in this browser profile when storage is available. Reset to sample clears that draft; Pro history has its own clear button. A state link encodes your inputs in its URL: share only non-sensitive rows. Browser history, clipboard and anyone receiving the link may retain it. Optional AI use below leaves this device; it is not required.

Data note: Everything runs in this browser tab on the source recency docket: your cited source | years since publication | times cited in draft stays on this device, nothing is uploaded, and the reading is rebuilt only when you press run.

Perspective: Before: Age matters far less for a methods paper or a primary historical source than for a current-statistics citation, and the weighting shows which sources you lean on. After: the source recency docket shows the working beside each named row so the reader can change the assumption and inspect the consequence.

2 · Read the source recency docket

Recency arithmetic on publication years and citation counts you supply. Not an academic-integrity finding, discipline norm or supervisor policy; confirm acceptable source ages with your supervisor, journal or department before rewriting.

source recency docket print and history is ready when you are

Your free reading stays usable — always. The one-time layer keeps everything gently filed for you: history, CSV, print reading.

Boundary and sources

Recency arithmetic on publication years and citation counts you supply. Not an academic-integrity finding, discipline norm or supervisor policy; confirm acceptable source ages with your supervisor, journal or department before rewriting.

Mechanism: competence-autonomy-loop

Optional AI formatting, not calculation

For this source recency docket, use the free AI Studio interface only if available to you, with no paid API key. Manual entry completes the same workflow for free. Supply only fictional or non-sensitive notes. Review its output against the source; never paste unresolved questions into the numeric rows.

Format my non-sensitive notes for a source recency docket. Return plain rows only: cited source | years since publication | times cited in draft. Preserve supplied quantities exactly. Do not guess missing values; list questions separately. Do not calculate or add advice. I will check every row before pasting into the local tool.

Accepted schema: cited source | years since publication | times cited in draft. No AI response is executed as code.