Compare Classification Thresholds Without Hiding Error-Cost Tradeoffs
Two thresholds can trade false positives for false negatives while their accuracy percentages look reassuringly similar. Use a fixed classroom dataset and an explicit cost assumption to inspect that tradeoff instead of calling one threshold best without a criterion.
1 · Threshold code | true positives | false positives | false negatives | true negatives
FIRST-LOAD
HYPOTHESIS / PROTOTYPE — checkout unavailable. Calculation is local. A draft is saved automatically in this browser profile when storage is available; Reset to sample clears it. Optional Pro history stores only five summaries and has its own deletion control. State links encode your inputs and can remain in browser history, clipboard or recipients’ records; share only non-sensitive rows. Optional external AI formatting leaves this device. The required site analytics beacon reports page activity; shared URLs contain encoded inputs. Do not treat an encoded URL as private. The calculator has no input-collection endpoint.
Data note: The confusion-cost board processes Threshold code | true positives | false positives | false negatives | true negatives locally. Starter/sample selection and Run compute in this tab; no input is sent by the calculator. A local draft may be saved; explicit state-link sharing or optional external AI formatting can disclose inputs. Use non-sensitive labels.
Perspective: Before: one accuracy number concealed unlike error types. After: a fixed dataset and explicit error-cost multiple make the threshold tradeoff inspectable.
2 · Read the confusion-cost board
Classroom evaluation arithmetic only, not medical-test interpretation, automated hiring or a deployment recommendation. Ask an instructor or qualified analyst to review labels, evaluation design and cost assumptions before any consequential use.
Paid layer: confusion-cost board filing layer
one-time step · the free reading above stays complete
Free tier
- one complete unwatermarked confusion-cost board run in the app
- three labeled samples and unlimited article-demo calculations
- complete result text and a user-triggered input-state link
What $4 one-time adds
- unlimited subsequent confusion-cost board app calculations after a local convenience signal
- print the confusion-cost board with visible assumptions and its safety boundary
- CSV of the displayed cost units per 100 records and row workings; conditional estimate uses your manual-retyping minutes
- five local reading summaries (headline/count/time), not saved full inputs or cross-device backups
HYPOTHESIS / PROTOTYPE: $4 is a proposed one-time price for filing the confusion-cost board, not a current sales offer. No measured time saving or buyer demand is claimed. The optional manual-retyping baseline above estimates one export’s retyping budget only; it does not change the calculation or guarantee savings.
Local history (this device)
- No saved runs yet — your first run files here.
Checkout is unavailable. Browser-local, profile-scoped convenience gating is best-effort, not server-verified access. A URL or browser flag is not proof of payment. Clearing browser data removes local state; no account or cross-device recovery is provided.
Boundary and sources
Classroom evaluation arithmetic only, not medical-test interpretation, automated hiring or a deployment recommendation. Ask an instructor or qualified analyst to review labels, evaluation design and cost assumptions before any consequential use.
- Method: For each threshold, compute false positives plus the supplied multiple times false negatives. Divide by total records and multiply by one hundred for comparable cost units per hundred. Also retain sensitivity and specificity so the same cost does not hide different error patterns. The model uses no guessed financial amount or claim about the severity of an error.
- All sample records, dates, quantities and labels are invented. No outside policy, contract, rate, clock offset, measurement or accessibility standard is represented as verified.
- Google’s official pricing documentation, fetched 2026-10-01, says AI Studio is free in available regions. Optional formatting may require a Google account; manual local entry requires none. Limits can change and free-tier content may be used to improve products. Do not send private records.
Mechanism: competence-autonomy-loop
Optional AI formatting, never the calculation
Manual entry completes this confusion-cost board for free without signup. If available to you, the free AI Studio interface linked in the sources may format fictional or non-sensitive notes; external access may require an account. No API key or AI call is built into this tool. Free-tier content may be used to improve products. Review each cell and transcribe it to the labeled row schema; do not paste the JSON object into the row box.
Format only these fictional or non-sensitive notes for a confusion-cost board. Return strict JSON shaped as {"rows": [{"label": "string", "cells": ["string", "string", "string", "string"]}], "setting": "string"}. The columns are Threshold code | true positives | false positives | false negatives | true negatives; the setting is False-negative cost in false-positive cost units. Keep all supplied strings and quantities exactly; do not calculate, infer missing entries, invent dates or add advice. If any required value is missing, return an empty rows array and ask me for it separately. I will verify every cell against my source and manually transcribe rows using vertical bars before running the local calculator.An AI response is not executed, fetched or trusted as a result. Missing values remain questions; the strict local parser checks the rows you actually enter.