dominance review clipboard · triage clipboard with three lanes

Separate Dominated Project Scenarios from Genuine Budget Tradeoffs

A weighted score can hide a project that is worse on every stated dimension. Expose dominance first, preserve real tradeoffs, and leave public-value judgments with the community.

1 · Project code | cost dollars | assumed benefit points | duration weeks

FIRST-LOAD

HYPOTHESIS / PROTOTYPE — checkout unavailable. Calculation is local. A draft is saved automatically in this browser profile when storage is available; Reset to sample clears it. Optional Pro history stores only five summaries and has its own deletion control. State links encode your inputs and can remain in browser history, clipboard or recipients’ records; share only non-sensitive rows. Optional external AI formatting leaves this device. The required site analytics beacon reports page activity; shared URLs contain encoded inputs. Do not treat an encoded URL as private. The calculator has no input-collection endpoint.

Data note: This dominance review clipboard calculates in the tab from Project code | cost dollars | assumed benefit points | duration weeks. No input-collection endpoint, AI request or file upload is built into it. Drafts may be saved locally; explicit input-state links and optional external formatting can disclose the records. Use non-sensitive codes and clear the draft when finished.

Perspective: Before: a single score concealed every-dimension losses. After: strict dominance, equal profiles and unresolved tradeoffs remain separate without a fabricated winner.

2 · Read the dominance review clipboard

Scenario comparison only: no policy endorsement, legal advice, verified public-benefit score or project approval. Review source evidence, omitted equity/access factors and governing rules with the responsible committee and qualified advisers before acting.

Paid layer: dominance review clipboard filing layer

one-time step · the free reading above stays complete

hidden patterns detected after your first run

Free tier

one full, unwatermarked dominance review clipboard App execution
three invented readings and unlimited calculations in the paired article demo
copy the complete working and boundary; voluntarily share non-sensitive input state

What $4 one-time adds

subsequent dominance review clipboard App calculations through a browser-local convenience signal
boundary-preserving print and row-and-summary CSV of this dominance review clipboard; conditional retyping budget uses only your entered minutes
five local headline/count/time summaries, separately deletable; full-input draft is separate and not a backup

HYPOTHESIS / PROTOTYPE: the proposed $4 one-time price concerns filing this dominance review clipboard, not obtaining its answer. No checkout is available. An optional manual-retyping baseline computes a conditional one-export retyping budget; preparation, review, measured savings and buyer demand are not implied.

Local history (this device)

No saved runs yet — your first run files here.

Filing prototype — checkout unavailable

Checkout is unavailable. Browser-local, profile-scoped convenience gating is best-effort, not server-verified access. A URL or browser flag is not proof of payment. Clearing browser data removes local state; no account or cross-device recovery is provided.

Optional filing controls are a local prototype.

Checkout is unavailable. The reading above is complete; print, CSV and five local summaries are optional enhancements, not hidden answers.

Before using the dominance review clipboard

This clipboard compares supplied scenarios under three explicitly chosen directions: lower cost, higher assumed benefit points and shorter duration. It filters by a supplied budget before checking dominance. Benefit points are your common ordered scale, not a value measured or endorsed by the tool. Dominance means another eligible scenario is at least as good on all three numbers and strictly better on at least one. Non-dominated does not mean best, fair, feasible or approved. The model excludes qualitative access, distributional impact, uncertainty, maintenance and legal constraints. Those omissions must be reviewed by responsible organizers before any real civic choice.

Boundary and sources

Declared local method: For each candidate, find all other eligible candidates with cost no higher, benefit no lower and duration no longer. Require at least one strict improvement before calling it dominated. Identical numeric profiles are not dominance and remain separately visible. List the dominating counterpart codes next to a marked project; do not hide the comparison inside a total score. The headline is the size of the eligible non-dominated set, not the sum of benefit points or an expected return.
Every sample code, measurement, date, price, fingerprint and scenario is invented. Artifact checks do not verify reader data, policies, actual files, tickets, votes or health/accessibility outcomes.
Google’s official Gemini pricing page, fetched 2026-10-01, lists AI Studio access in its Free section, limited model access and free input/output tokens. Free-tier content may be used to improve products. Optional external formatting may require an account; limits/access can change. Manual local entry needs none. Do not send sensitive records.

Mechanism: competence-autonomy-loop

Optional AI formatting, never the calculation

Manual entry completes this dominance review clipboard for free without signup. If available to you, the free AI Studio interface linked in the sources may format fictional or non-sensitive notes; external access may require an account. No API key or AI call is built into this tool. Free-tier content may be used to improve products. Review each cell and transcribe it to the labeled row schema; do not paste the JSON object into the row box.

Format only these fictional or non-sensitive notes for a dominance review clipboard. Return strict JSON shaped as {"rows": [{"label": "string", "cells": ["string", "string", "string"]}], "setting": "string"}. The columns are Project code | cost dollars | assumed benefit points | duration weeks; the setting is Scenario budget ceiling ($). Keep all supplied strings and quantities exactly; do not calculate, infer missing entries, invent dates or add advice. If any required value is missing, return an empty rows array and ask me for it separately. I will verify every cell against my source and manually transcribe rows using vertical bars before running the local calculator.

An AI response is not executed, fetched or trusted as a result. Missing values remain questions; the strict local parser checks the rows you actually enter.