Budget Review Time for Unsupported Rubric Criteria
Count criteria that still lack a specific piece of evidence and reserve review time for them. A long draft is not proof that every rubric requirement is addressed.
1 · rubric section | required criteria | criteria supported by evidence
FIRST-LOAD
Input is processed locally. A state link encodes your inputs in its URL: share only non-sensitive rows. Browser history, clipboard and anyone receiving the link may retain it. Optional AI use below leaves this device; it is not required.
Data note: Everything runs in this browser tab on the criterion concordance: your rubric section | required criteria | criteria supported by evidence stays on this device, nothing is uploaded, and the reading is rebuilt only when you press run.
Perspective: Before: More words may still miss a required comparison. After: the criterion concordance shows the working beside each named row so the reader can change the assumption and inspect the consequence.
2 · Read the criterion concordance
This plans a self-review and does not grade work or infer academic requirements. Clarify disputed rubric wording with the instructor.
Paid layer: criterion concordance print and history
one-time step · the free reading above stays complete
Free tier
- one complete criterion concordance run in the app
- three samples plus unlimited article-demo runs
- unwatermarked result text and an explicit, user-triggered state link
What $4 one-time adds
- print the criterion concordance with its row workings
- CSV of review minutes and row explanations
- last five reading summaries saved in this browser profile
$4 once for repeated filing of the criterion concordance, not for a better answer. Illustrative time basis: avoiding one five-minute manual reformat per saved reading; no market-price or guaranteed-savings claim.
Local history (this device)
- No saved runs yet — your first run files here.
Checkout is unavailable until a payment link is configured. The optional unlock is browser-local, profile-scoped and best-effort, not server-verified access. Clearing browser data can remove it; there is no account or cross-device recovery.
Boundary and sources
This plans a self-review and does not grade work or infer academic requirements. Clarify disputed rubric wording with the instructor.
- Method: The minutes-per-gap setting covers finding what is missing and planning a revision, not necessarily writing the entire fix. The starter has four unsupported criteria and reserves forty-eight minutes.
- All sample records are invented examples. The app does not fetch measurements, policies, files or personal records.
- Google’s official pricing page, fetched 2026-09-27, lists free-tier access including AI Studio. Optional formatting only; limits and availability can change. Free-tier content may be used to improve products. Never paste private records there.
Mechanism: competence-autonomy-loop
Optional AI formatting, not calculation
For this criterion concordance, use the free AI Studio interface only if available to you, with no paid API key. Manual entry completes the same workflow for free. Supply only fictional or non-sensitive notes. Review its output against the source; never paste unresolved questions into the numeric rows.
Format my non-sensitive notes for a criterion concordance. Return plain rows only: rubric section | required criteria | criteria supported by evidence. Preserve supplied quantities exactly. Do not guess missing values; list questions separately. Do not calculate or add advice. I will check every row before pasting into the local tool.
Accepted schema: rubric section | required criteria | criteria supported by evidence. No AI response is executed as code.