GratisAIaccessibility · field guide · local-first · no account
provider matrix

Compare Access Providers on Cost Per Attendee Hour — Free

Paste quotes for captions, interpreting and hearing loops, and read cost per attendee hour rather than per event.

The proof surface

Day rates make a 400-person event and a 60-person workshop look comparable. Per attendee hour is the figure procurement can defend and the one that reveals coverage gaps.

Inputprovider quotes for captions, interpreting and loops beside your attendance figures
Rare devicenormalises accessibility provider quotes to cost per attendee hour from the reader's own attendance figures
Output artifacta matrix with cost per attendee hour computed per provider and coverage gaps noted
Cost$0 · local-first · one free run · samples labelled
Sample, not your facts: Sample: live captions $900 for 8 hours, two interpreters $1,450, loop hire $320 plus $90 delivery, 400 attendees, 14 session hours — four concrete points across four types.

Why the flat version breaks

Day-rate comparison

A $900 caption rate across 14 hours is a very different cost per attendee hour from the same rate across a 3-hour session.

Coverage assumed

Quotes often cover the plenary only; parallel sessions and the second day are where accessibility quietly disappears.

Ignoring remote attendance

Hybrid events need captions for the stream as well as the room, and the per-attendee figure should count both audiences.

How to work the provider matrix

Paste the quotes

One provider per line with the service, price and the hours or days it covers.

Enter attendance and hours

Both figures produce the per attendee hour column every row is judged on.

Read the matrix

Rows carry quote, hours and coverage, with the per-attendee-hour figure heading its own column.

Brief the provider

Send the coverage gaps and ask for a second-day price before signing.

What the matrix replaces

QuestionBeforeOn the matrix
Which quote is best valuecompare day ratescost per attendee hour per provider
What is not coveredassume it is includedcoverage gaps noted under the rows
What to negotiate'can you do better?'second-day and multi-session breaks

The matrix ranks your own quotes; it does not certify a provider's quality and it cannot see what participants actually need.

Run it on the samples, right here

FIRST-LOAD

Data note: Everything runs in this browser tab on the provider matrix: your provider quotes stays on this device, nothing is uploaded, and the reading is rebuilt only when you press run.

Go deeper: the companion app files the same reading as a scored comparison matrix

The article demo above runs without limits. The companion app keeps a local history, exports the rows as CSV, prints the ready-to-mail packet, and holds your drafts on this device — one free run, then $ 8 one-time for the layer that keeps filing.

The matrix and the normalised columns are free. The paid layer keeps four events and prints the provider brief.

Open the provider comparison matrix companion

Boundary

This provider matrix works only on the provider quotes and attendance figures you paste you paste. It does not judge caption quality, does not certify interpreters, and does not book the providers. The figures describe what you supplied, not what is true in the world. Confirm anything you plan to act on with disabled attendees and an access adviser when deciding what to commission before you rely on it.

What this is built on

Before: the reader compared day rates. After: they can see the same $900 interpreting quote is cheaper per attendee hour for a 400-person event.