GratisAIcivic · free field guide
docket field guide · reviewed 2026-09-12

Turn a School-Board Policy Into Questions for the Meeting — Free

Extract a policy section, affected decision, evidence to bring, and a question that fits the meeting record. This guide treats policy questions as a physical working surface, so you can inspect the relationship instead of accepting a generic paragraph.

The proof surface

The ordinary version gives you a list. The docket makes the missing relationship visible and leaves a named next step.

INPUTPolicy or agenda item, question count, and meeting date
RARE DEVICEkeeps the source section beside the question and evidence so public participation is grounded in the actual agenda item
OUTPUTa meeting docket with section tabs, timed question slots, and a clipped evidence annex
COST$0 · local-first · no account

Why the flat version breaks

A flat checklist hides the decision that makes this job hard. For policy questions, the missing detail is not more advice; it is the relationship between the source, the measurable field, the date, and the note you will act on. The companion card keeps those layers separate and lets you change one input without rewriting the whole page.

Use the docket in four passes

01 · Bring the smallest useful sourceEnter a specific policy or agenda item, a non-negative question count, a date, and one concrete note. Do not paste identifying details you do not need.
02 · Let the physical metaphor sort the workThe card turns the inputs into a meeting docket with section tabs, timed question slots, and a clipped evidence annex. Its spacing, columns, or route order carry meaning; the result is not a raw paragraph.
03 · Change one field and compareUse the second or third starter record, then edit one value. The result should change for a reason you can name. That is the useful check against false confidence.
04 · Keep the next action modestUse the printed or copied result as a handoff, review prompt, or planning surface. Verify outside facts with the source before you commit to a high-stakes decision.
Sample data, not a verified claim: Maple County attendance policy 4.12 · 6 question count · 2026-09-24 · Bring the published absence notice and the district calendar. These values are illustrative so the first card has something concrete to show; replace them with your own source.

What breaks first

Empty or vague input

If there is no subject or note, the app leaves the card in an empty state and tells you what to add. It does not invent a result.

A number that does not fit

Negative, fractional, or oversized counts stay in the fields and produce an actionable input message. Check the unit before you rely on the number.

Outside facts

The local card organizes what you entered; it does not confirm a deadline, rate, rule, diagnosis, or booking. Keep the source beside the result.

Try the free docket

The companion opens with the same sample shape, three starter records, a reset state, a copyable result, and a state link. Nothing is sent to a server.

Open the free policy questions card →

Keep the work if you will use it again

FREE COREComplete on-screen result at $0

Run the card repeatedly, edit the source, and copy the result without creating an account.

$4 ONE-TIMEPrint and retain the structure

Printable meeting docket with the same 6 questions; estimate: 6 rows × ~2 minutes of formatting = ~12 minutes avoided. The paid tier extends the result; it does not remove the free core.

Go deeper in the companion app →

Use the boundary as part of the result. this organizer does not give legal advice, interpret a jurisdiction’s rules, or guarantee an outcome. Confirm deadlines and next steps with the relevant office or a qualified local professional.