Budget Review Time for Unsupported Rubric Criteria — Free
Count criteria that still lack a specific piece of evidence and reserve review time for them. A long draft is not proof that every rubric requirement is addressed.
The proof surface
Citation tools link sources to claims. This tracks whether each assessment criterion has evidence in the submission, without scoring its quality or predicting a grade.
Why the flat version breaks
Equating length with coverage
More words may still miss a required comparison.
Double-counting one passage
One paragraph may support several criteria only if it actually addresses each.
Treating coverage as a grade
The instrument does not read the draft or assess quality.
How to work the criterion concordance
Use the instructor’s actual rubric and keep sections mutually exclusive. Do not split a criterion into several easy fragments merely to increase the supported count.
Count a criterion as supported only when you can locate the relevant passage, figure or demonstration. Keep page references in your own notes; this tool needs only counts.
The minutes-per-gap setting covers finding what is missing and planning a revision, not necessarily writing the entire fix. The starter has four unsupported criteria and reserves forty-eight minutes.
Use the missing list to frame questions for a tutor. Recount after revising, but keep quality judgment separate: a box ticked does not mean the evidence is persuasive.
What the criterion concordance replaces
| Question | Before | Visible working |
|---|---|---|
| Equating length with coverage | More words may still miss a required comparison. | Point to evidence before counting |
| Double-counting one passage | One paragraph may support several criteria only if it actually addresses each. | Reserve diagnostic review time |
| Treating coverage as a grade | The instrument does not read the draft or assess quality. | Ask about ambiguous expectations |
A local arithmetic aid replaces hand calculation, not expert review. No paid AI service is needed.
Run it on the samples, right here
FIRST-LOAD
Input is processed locally. A state link encodes your inputs in its URL: share only non-sensitive rows. Browser history, clipboard and anyone receiving the link may retain it. Optional AI use below leaves this device; it is not required.
This plans a self-review and does not grade work or infer academic requirements. Clarify disputed rubric wording with the instructor.
Data note: Everything runs in this browser tab on the criterion concordance: your rubric section | required criteria | criteria supported by evidence stays on this device, nothing is uploaded, and the reading is rebuilt only when you press run.
Go deeper: the companion app files the same reading as a scored comparison matrix
The article demo above runs without limits. The companion app keeps a local history, exports the rows as CSV, prints the criterion concordance reading, and holds your drafts on this device — one free run, then $ 4 one-time for the layer that keeps filing.
The criterion concordance reading is complete for free. The optional $4 layer adds print, row CSV and the last five local reading summaries; it does not add hidden answers. Checkout is not configured yet; the article demo remains unlimited.
Open the budget review time for unsupported rubric criteria companionBoundary
This plans a self-review and does not grade work or infer academic requirements. Clarify disputed rubric wording with the instructor.
What this is built on
- Method: The minutes-per-gap setting covers finding what is missing and planning a revision, not necessarily writing the entire fix. The starter has four unsupported criteria and reserves forty-eight minutes.
- All sample records are invented examples. The app does not fetch measurements, policies, files or personal records.
- Google’s official pricing page, fetched 2026-09-27, lists free-tier access including AI Studio. Optional formatting only; limits and availability can change. Free-tier content may be used to improve products. Never paste private records there.
Before: More words may still miss a required comparison. After: the criterion concordance shows the working beside each named row so the reader can change the assumption and inspect the consequence.
Optional AI formatting, not calculation
For this criterion concordance, use the free AI Studio interface only if available to you, with no paid API key. Manual entry completes the same workflow for free. Supply only fictional or non-sensitive notes. Review its output against the source; never paste unresolved questions into the numeric rows.
Format my non-sensitive notes for a criterion concordance. Return plain rows only: rubric section | required criteria | criteria supported by evidence. Preserve supplied quantities exactly. Do not guess missing values; list questions separately. Do not calculate or add advice. I will check every row before pasting into the local tool.
Accepted schema: rubric section | required criteria | criteria supported by evidence. No AI response is executed as code.