business · local-first tool
Compare Team Commitments with the Hours People Have Offered
A project plan can look staffed while one person's hours are already promised twice.
Summarize planned and available hours by team member or role; display gaps without scoring people.
What changes the result: the team's own planned hours, coverage periods, and capacity assumptions.
Privacy: Calculations run in this browser tab. This tool has no input-upload, account, or AI endpoint. The site may send a page-view signal to Cloudflare; this tool does not add form entries to that signal. A draft is stored only if you choose “Save draft on this device”; that browser storage is not encrypted. Avoid identifiers or sensitive details, and delete saved drafts when finished.
Your entries
The starting rows below are fictional examples. Edit them, replace them with non-sensitive labels and values, or load the sample again. The result is not advice or a source verification.
Amount fields use the same units you enter; the app does not choose a currency. Dates are the ones you provide. Up to 100 rows per run.
Calculated output
What the calculation does
For each block, calculate max(0, hours needed minus hours offered), then add the gaps. The tool cannot establish consent, skill, suitability, or whether a person can cover a task.
Question to keep open: Should a plan maximize utilization or preserve slack for support work and unexpected needs?
Boundary: This is not a productivity score, staffing recommendation, or employee-performance record. Use aggregated role labels where possible and discuss assumptions with the team.
Copy includes the headline, aggregate metrics, and boundary—not the row-by-row input. The CSV contains entries you choose to download. Review it before sharing.